Who Controls The News?
Any SCJ member would be familiar with IT activities. It is likely you have once been asked to make posts on social media, whether on a new or actual account, about HWPL. Sharing, liking, bumping the view counts on YouTube videos, a large majority of these YouTube videos having been produced by SCJ channels, to counter-back the negative newsmedia about SCJ.
The reason why I'm making this post, is to raise awareness for current members. The YouTube videos that you promote from within, I doubt anyone from the outside actually watches these videos, and change their mind about SCJ, especially when the comments are obviously fake and filled with "wow so happy..." "this is the fulfillment of revelation!!". Not only videos, but even blog posts, and news articles made on news pages that are owned and made by SCJ. I believe this is a problem, because it plays on peoples biases. For example, there was an instance where students were being shown videos about SCJ. It was about the 100,000 graduation, and their amazement was partly because "the news was talking about it." I didn't tell them about it at the time, wanted to, but these videos, were made by SCJ made-media groups/channels. If you looked at popular news sites; I literally never saw any news about the 100,000 graduation(in a positive light atleast, esp after the covid events), except those coming from sites made by SCJ. But the bias, that "if the news reported about it, it must be a big deal(informal)", has an influence, and it's not the only one used, but I am just emphasizing it here for this post.I want to make a moral case here.
Let's say SCJ is right, and true, and it will fulfill. When they conquer and rule the world, and sin is no more, death is swallowed up etc, who will control the news? If everyone became an SCJ member in the world, even people of the NBC, New York Times, ABC, SBS, BBC, do you think they will report truthfully all the time? They likely will about other world events, but anytime they report about SCJ, you think it will ever be negative, or never biased to favor their view? Would you be willing to live an eternal future like that, even if they are right? Again this is a moral case. If you are willing to sacrifice your own human morals, than I think you'd have no problem with that eternal lifetime because "they are right though".
I personally however, call me foolish or virtuous, would rather suffer hell than sacrifice my own morals than serve a tyrannical organisation.